Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In this modern world, people are getting so much fake instead of being real. It is important to show others the original side with increasing change of world people are also changing. Some people are inclined toward the attitude that the present life is beautiful and happiness is all around us, whereas others have a different perspective. No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of life in a modern world. In the following essay, I intend to put forth my points and reasons for support.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that in this era, people give priority to money rather than relationship. No doubt working is essential to earn but it is not life, as there is a lot of stress and only family can give relief. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. When I moved to an urban area in order to earn some money and in search of more money I left my family behind. Furthermore, one day at the annual dinner of the company my all colleagues were with parents even my clerk at that time my heart was about to burst after seeing then I realized my mistake. I thought money will make us happy but unfortunately, it is a big lie. As a result, after a long depressing period, I moved back to my village. Therefore, this experience taught me that never look for satisfaction and happiness in money.
Secondly, people have indulged themselves completely in social media. This generation does not know the importance of being happy. As in the past, people love to give their time to family neighbors and feel so blessed especially after helping humanity. Now the old parents are in old homes and their children are happy and satisfy with what they did. To exemplify, my uncle left their parents in an old home because he kept using social media to waste all his time but cannot give them time to his parents. This made me so angry I felt so sorry for them so I brought them to my home. Thus, this example illustrates that people do not know what is happiness.
In light of the reasons mentioned, I strongly agree that in past it was easy as everyone helps each other without any greed but now it really arduous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- When you face a difficult problem in life what do you feel is the best way to solve it asking someone with more experience for advice about the problem finding information about the problem using the Internet taking a long time to think about the problem 70
- Today the world is really busy and crowded so we should not expect politeness from anyone agree and disagree 60
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage
- Nowadays food has become easier to prepare Has this change improved the way people live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, whereas, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 402.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50995024876 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48101751001 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559701492537 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7873166505 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90476190476 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210106345246 0.236089414692 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599645891171 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500752247294 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126545020782 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610216782425 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.