It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The advent of technological developments for humankind in this contemporary world has proved its boon. The traditional rich heritage and rituals that have been followed by our ancestors are still followed to this day. I completely disagree with this that the technological advancements and traditional cultures cannot sustain together.
First of all, there is a lot of difference between religious disbelieves and cultures. What cannot sustain together is disbelieves and modern science. A lot of people still believe in numerous disbelieves that are totally nurtured by religion/tradition but the availability of scientific explanation can efficiently remove any particular disbelief. All the technological developments are done for humans only so that they can make their work much easier not to restrict them from doing any particular tasks. For instance, marriage is a process completely executed with all traditional cultures and rituals followed, but technological advancement does not have any kind of issue with it. In fact, the technological gadgets enhance the event like cameras, video, and social media etcetera.
Secondly, humans cannot live without their respective culture and rituals, as it is what they have faith in. These cultures and rituals often make them feel satisfied. For instance, astrology is completely apart from modern science and technology but that does not mean that they can not fit in the picture together. There are many people who believe in astrology and also perform their daily tasks accordingly but are surrounded by various technological gadgets. They even build their respective residence according to it but at the same time filling it with all the technologies they can.
To reiterate, all the modern science and technologies and the traditionally followed cultures are completely compatible. What modern science do is remove the misunderstandings created by the culture, not the culture itself. Instead, it enhances the celebrations which are performed traditionally. Moreover, people like to have faith in their own race's culture but live life surrounded by all the technologies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 73
- Write about the following topic Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your a 89
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period Summarise 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, apart from, for instance, in fact, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59567901235 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19813111054 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4622669836 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.722222222 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2889967361 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944313247786 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751422466426 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194224350301 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518380512383 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, apart from, for instance, in fact, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59567901235 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19813111054 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4622669836 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.722222222 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2889967361 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944313247786 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751422466426 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194224350301 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518380512383 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.