Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that now celebrities have a more handsome income compared to politicians. There are some main justifications behind this fact, and I believe it is totally a positive improvement as a whole.
To begin with, there exist a number of reasons why celebrities make more money. First and foremost, celebrity endorsement is a chief factor in this respect. Being in so many advertisements in various places and media, these famous people, who are mostly athletes, actors and actresses, are able to earn huge amounts of money per se. Second, on the contrary to politicians, these celebrities are either members of big sports teams or movie stars in which their annual salaries are increasingly higher than other professions, including politicians. Take those full-fledged athletes and TV stars, like C. Ronaldo and Jennifer Lopez, as an example; they
generate money more than any individual working in policy in the world.
Since celebrities have gained a reputation for being more socially acceptable than politicians, at least in my country, I think money earned by famed people more than statesmen is a positive development. As a matter of fact, the decisions made by these legislators could impact many lives. As an illustration, my country’s senior leaders have been circumventing unrelenting international sanctions in recent years. It is just because of one person’s decision, and the main losers of this
unjust war are people themselves who have to withstand
many hardships. On the other hand, celebrated people, who are way more popular than politicians, deserve to have better incomes as all they do revolves around putting smiles on their people’s faces.
In conclusion, I think advertisement makes a big difference in terms of income of these two groups. Furthermore, celebrities are more beneficial to their society than politics, at least in my country, and in turn, it is a positive fact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-10 | mahyarr | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-19 | ssssohailaaaahmad | 67 | view |
| 2020-12-11 | apoorvachikara18 | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-25 | Lee Hwa | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-26 | Jitenramen | 61 | view |
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety to other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 78
- You live in a room in college which you share with another student There are many problems With this arrangement and you find it difficult to work Write a letter to the accommodation officer at the college In the letter Describe the situation Explain the 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 89
- You recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time Write a letter to the editor in your letter 1 Say which edition and when the article appeared 2 Explain why you lost contact with your 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attractions in Britain in the year 1999 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and Jennifer Lopez, as an example; they generate money more than any individual ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, second, so, at least, i think, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25974025974 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0739329731 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603896103896 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6191371428 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1333333333 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279417580601 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873571031097 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802586255951 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125977032443 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627225011034 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.