The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurents between 2003 and 2013.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar diagram shows continuous consumption of people at the fast food restaurents in the USA during the year 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, people consumed fast food at the restaurents in the USA mostly once a week in 2006 and once or twice a month in 2013. However, they never ingested fast food in the restaurents in the year 2006 and 2013 whereas in 2006 and 2013, similar amount of people went to restaurents for eating junk food every day.
From 2003 too 2006, percentage of everyday consumption of junk food in the restaurents fall by 1% although it increased by 3% in several times a week and also once in a week. Looking specifically at the year 2006 the percentage of once or twice in a month decreased considerably by 5%. On contrary, almost 4% people never ingested fast food in the restaurents in both of the year 2006 and 2003.
In 2013, percentage of restaurents going people for eating fast food was maximum once or twice in a month, while the percentage of people who ate in the restaurents a few times a year did not show any change in 2013 which was 15% in 2006. The number of people who never visited restaurents was 5% in 2003 that dipped by 1% in 2013.
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 63
- Levels of consumer debt are increasing across the world To address this a new subject should be introduced in secondary school how to manage personal finances Discuss and give your opinion 87
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects which interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs 79
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurents between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45412844037 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58317166689 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435779816514 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.075854577 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253202313238 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148515402117 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724686935625 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199197017519 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493494138038 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.