The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts how many books that men and women read at Burnaby Public Library between the year 2011 and 2014.
Overall, it is clear that both the number of books at this library read by males and females increased over the period of 3 years, with the figure for males experiencing a more dramatic rise.
In 2011, men read around 3000 books in Burnaby Public Library and women read up to about 5000 books. By 2012, both quantities rose but at different rate, with the number of books that women read going up to approximately 8000 books, which was twice as high as men.
A similar pattern can be seen from 2012 to 2013 during which the number of books read by males rocketed by about 6000 books. At the same time, the figure for females slowly rose, until reaching its peak at 10000 books in 2013, which was equal to men’s read book numbers. On the contrary, by the end of the period, while the number of books read by men continue rocketing to a peak of 14000, that by women saw a drop back to 8000 books in 2014.
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people prefer to help or support directly in the local community for people who need it however others prefer to give money to the national or private charities Discuss both views and give your own opinions 78
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 73
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents 73
- As a result of electronic inventions such as the computer and television people do less physical activity and this is having a negative effect on their health To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34196891192 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04175321923 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544041450777 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.0353533187 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345909102351 0.215688989381 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192631996392 0.103423049105 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931839297068 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241767549751 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930947596395 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.19 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.