The diagrams below show the main reasons workers chose to work from home and the hours males and females worked at home for the year 2019.
The bar chart illustrates the information about people why they work from home and the table reveals data about the time in which people do work from home in 2019.
Overall, both gendar work remotely from their office to save money. However men are more productive from home while the women do childcare more comfortablely doing work from home. In addition, most of the female worked under 10 hours while men worked more then 30 hours.
The grapg show that the men and worked from home to save money with tiny difference 3%, however, 45% male and 43% women worked from home. Men were almost two times more productive 24% while women were 11% in 2019. women were more then six time interested to do childcare then men 4%. 74% women had worked under 10 hours while 3% male worked 3%. 10 to 30 hours male worked 16% and 22% male work. 81% male worked over 30 hours and 6% male worked in 2019. In conclusion, with increased of number hours women percentage decreased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-15 | Trịnh Trí Dũng | 89 | view |
| 2022-02-06 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-06 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | Elahe Rasooli | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | Muhammad Hassam Saeed | 67 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- It is increasingly popular to have a year off between finishing school and going to university What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 78
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...motely from their office to save money. However men are more productive from home while...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ed under 10 hours while men worked more then 30 hours. The grapg show that the men ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Women
...ctive 24% while women were 11% in 2019. women were more then six time interested to d...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...women were 11% in 2019. women were more then six time interested to do childcare the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 792.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55172413793 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13530304431 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.370610163 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389065652489 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181188191326 0.103423049105 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114088099412 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.288423510542 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361659602485 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.29 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.