The maps below shows university sports courts in 1990 and now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The diagram illustrates how the university sport court has been changed from 1990 to and present day. Overall, there was plenty of changes in the position of various facilities inside the complex.
In 1990, on the left side of the sports court, there was mainly a park and car parking area. Whereas, parks with trees and grasses were replaced by basketball courts nowadays. Likewise, there was two tennis court located in the right side of the map which doubled and relocated to the left side in the area of car parking.
On the right side of the court, after renovation cafe and reception area are positioned in the same place. However, presently outdoor pool changed to an indoor pool on the upper side of the map. On the same side changing room moved to in between the indoor pool and gym centre which was the place of a tennis court is situated in earlier times. Therefore, all the arrangements line up in a position on either side of the recent map.
- Shopping habits depend more on your age group than anything else To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below describes water usage for 3 different purposes in 6 countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 40
- The pie chart below shows the percentage of water use in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1987 and 2007
- In most of the societies the role of mother and father differs What are the causes of this difference What will be the parental roles in future 56
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.» Write at least 150 words. 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61988304094 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34936380254 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8068358271 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129165874493 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609883177863 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527924717214 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947966721477 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279368873247 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61988304094 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34936380254 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8068358271 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129165874493 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609883177863 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527924717214 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947966721477 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279368873247 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.