People who have been close friends for a very long time have recently realised they have some feelings for each other. They want to become a couple, but afraid of negative consequences.
Do the advantages of being a couple outweigh the disadvantages?
Romantic relationships have been an ubiquitous topic for debate across ages and classes of society. It is often claimed that sympathies between entities who have long close-knit in terms of friendships promote them to become a couple although they are concerned about further undesirable situations simultaneously. Notwithstanding undeniable benefits, personally speaking, drawbacks are more noteworthy.
There is conspicuous evidence demonstrating what people believe that romantic relationships as a result of close friendships can be advantageous. They often argue that the longevity of a relationship will be escalated due to better mutual understanding. This is often in the circumstances when people share the similar social background, habits and attitudes which are the fundamental parts in interpersonal correlations. In addition to this, a romantic relationship can help motivate and complete a person's sense of responsibility and maturity. Sympathies and wisdom in solving partners' problems are cited to exemplify this case.
On the contrary, I wholeheartedly believe that disadvantageous situations are worth considering. The most prominent drawbacks to take into consideration is lower performance at school or work. Examples can be seen easily when teenagers are addicted to become interactive with their partners by spending the bulk of their time chatting. Consequently, poor results in either study or career are inevitable which lead to adverse criticisms from teachers and employers. Moreover, long-lasting romantic relationships cannot be enduring because of the effect of over mutual understanding. It has been for a metaphor suggesting that curiosity and inconsistency between entities are rudimentary to maintain a healthy couple. Paradoxically, a sequence of over understanding can lead to boring, less motivated, energetic and passionate conditions.
To put things in a nutshell, although advantages undoubtedly exist, I believe that healthy, long-lasting romantic relationships between entities who have long friendships will not be acquired due to the mentioned problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-20 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- The table below shows the number of visitors in the UK and their average spending from 2003 to 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What possible solutions can you suggest 89
- The table shows the number of international tourist arrivals in thousands in various countries in 2009 and 2010 together with the percentage change in these numbers 78
- Some people believe that one world government would be better than a national government Do you think the benefits of this system outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
Romantic relationships have been an ubiquitous topic for debate across ages...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, so, in addition, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03333333333 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54774419722 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8151981032 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.125 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19978054052 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525981895572 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606919927226 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127264413643 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691523029939 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.69 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.