Some people opine that entertainment or leisure activities should be subsidized by the government.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
There is no denying that the local authorities should be responsible for investing in entertainment and leisure activities. Despite many strong beliefs in the government's roles, I partly disagree with this, because people could gain more advantages from subsidizing by both the authorities and other organizations.
On the one hand, there are a variety of potential benefits when the government might attend in order to subsidize entertainment and recreation in their nation. Thanks to a significantly huge fund of the authorities, the most talented people around their countries are likely to have more opportunities to spend their gifts creating remarkably successful exciments for their communities. By all accounts, any investment for the public included in relaxing ones should be under control by the local authorities, which ensures the equality and systematic facilities in society. Besides, the governments could benefit through taxes and money coming from the income resources of those recreational complexes. As a result, the authorities are capable of using those national budgets for subsidizing other social aspects such as public housing, parks. The citizens, therefore, could also experience those benefits.
However, I also believe that not only the local authorities but also other organizations and privates could contribute their own finance for developing entertainment and exciting activities. Without any doubt, individuals and other organizations tend to detect the gifted and the latest trends more quickly than the governments. By updating the recreational facilities continuously, people are able to enjoy the most modern utilization. If the governments allow the attendance of other units to invest in entertaining activities, they could draw appealing attention to the foreign companies and their funding. Moreover, more people are getting employment, which creates personal self-independence and reduces the economic burdens for the government.
In conclusion, the government's investment plays a crucial role in the funding for entertainment and leisure activities. I personally have a little disagreement if people forget about the contribution of individuals and other units.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-24 | Lunar Tran | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Lunar Tran | 78 | view |
- Task 1 The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The world s natural resources are consumed at an ever increased rate What are the dangers of this situation What should we do 61
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 84
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement You should use your own ideas knowledge and experience and suppor 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...for the government. In conclusion, the governments investment plays a crucial role in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85758513932 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26644021008 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2889563032 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.133333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165318848374 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581357832472 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518090319278 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125193764837 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696788337094 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.