In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about whether some teachers are irresponsible for their duties. This has led to a suggestion that learners should have the right to appraise the performance of their lecturers. Personally speaking, I would subscribe to this idea to a large extent for the following two reasons.
To begin with, students have an opportunity to give their opinions to their teachers if they have access to the evaluation system. For instance, a math teacher tends to speak very fast in class without being aware that some low academic achievers find it hard to follow his pace, and this sometimes hinders students’ academic progress at school. Despite this setback, students could voice their opinions through the evaluation sheet, asking the teacher to make a slight adjustment of the teaching methods and pay more attention to those who lag behind in class. By so doing, the teacher can know his weakness while students can take notes and learn better in the future. In other words, teacher evaluation not only plays a crucial part in students’ learning but also creates a win-win situation for both educators and learners.
In addition, the evaluation system will prevent teachers from being lazy. For example, a Chemistry teacher never dedicates himself to his teaching jobs, nor does he care about how much progress his students have made. However, students could complain to the school authorities about the teacher’s irresponsibility, and then the school could dismiss those teachers who do not take their work seriously. Because of the evaluation system, schools could know whether lecturers are devoted to their duties and remind teachers to show commitment to their students. All in all, evaluating teachers gives students a chance to give feedback on their teachers and effectively helps schools supervise their faculty.
In conclusion, I believe schools should allow students to evaluate their teachers because it encourages lecturers to improve their teaching methods and provides students with access to expressing their opinions on their learning environment.
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sport for younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- All the people in a company should be treated equally and provided with the same numbers of vacations in a year To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sport for younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Psychological causes of internet addiction 11
- Students at universities often have the choice of places to live They may choose to live in university dormitories or they may choose to live in apartments in the community Compare the advantages of living in the university housing with the advantages of 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 649, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...while students can take notes and learn better in the future. In other words, teacher ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36936936937 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74430444422 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573573573574 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2523080097 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 100.406767564 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294747631354 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113727487808 0.076458572812 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066823985075 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195476425158 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707405410894 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.