Intelligence is the most important component of leadership. Do you agree or disagree?. Give adequate examples.
The stereotype that intelligence surpasses other complementary distributions to serve the leadership cannot gain our advocacy. Thus, there are three catalysts for the onward and upward administration.
First, withstanding all constraints, vision marks a milestone in wider approval. By virtue of strategies, if we predict the menace and ideal via data analysis, employees will find the discourse persuasive, then strive for the goals through mission statement - An anchor point as well as roadmap to workflow.
Second, optimism may establish the reputation for the long haul. When the failure occurs, from sanguine outlook, we lift the spirit of teammates not to trigger mental breakdown, boost unity and keep the atmosphere stable again. Under no circumstances should one prompt conflicts, even diminish their engagement.
Third, innovation constitutes the ultimate which managers must channel endeavor. We cannot intend to follow bandwagon or steal creativity to produce copycats. Practitioners could try new spheres, absorb experiences beyond our scope of knowledge and brainstorm the plan both theoretically plus practically.
Although intelligence lays the foundation for leadership, the trio of factors suggested also has its own advantages. I do assume the formula of success is to harmonize all elements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-27 | bangcong1501 | 11 | view |
- Intelligence is the most important component of leadership Do you agree or disagree Give adequate examples 11
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, so, then, third, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 41.998997996 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 193.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86010362694 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16604383476 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.813471502591 0.561755894193 145% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3664056995 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0595861013349 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0198733063434 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352210226557 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0361409809278 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457779494783 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.73 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.