More people put their personal information online (e.q address, telephone number) for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes , is this positive or negative development?
By virtue of industry 4.0 era, technological advancements lay a firm foundation for connectivity. However, notwithstanding the advocacy to update either profile or personal documents online, these risks will change our mindset.
First, youngsters may confront the cyberbullying via social networks. Not only do targets tolerate media criticism, but also have an invasion of privacy with no distress call. Thus, suicidal ideation happens sooner or later if the anonymous continues to pressurize and normalize verbal abuse.
Second, never before has the Internet leak been easier for perpetrators to exploit content of sexual harassment. They blackmail, coerce even threaten to spread the data among users when victims resist. Hence, the scandal ruins our reputation established and triggers trauma down the road.
Third, criminals perceive bank accounts with vulnerability as money mules to lauder transaction, or hide corruption. We diminish the distance from legitimacy, then get prosecuted by federal charges and prison sentences. The more recruitment of preys promotes, the less evidence the law proceeds against them.
On the whole, the viewpoint public posts contribute to online experience is indisputable. Under no circumstances should one overestimate the security system for fear that it causes him trouble.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-18 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
2024-03-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
2024-02-24 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
2024-02-24 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
2023-08-06 | gobidea | 89 | view |
- More people put their personal information online e q address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes is this positive or negative development 56
- Intelligence is the most important component of leadership Do you agree or disagree Give adequate examples 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l advancements lay a firm foundation for connectivity. However, notwithstanding t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, thus, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1139.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 194.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87113402062 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04482140697 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.840206185567 0.561755894193 150% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 506.74238477 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 15.4544568551 49.4020404114 31% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.6153846154 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9230769231 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0804353684828 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226368555374 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.021649021724 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0354219960523 0.151304729494 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00985976314199 0.056905535591 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.17 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.57 8.58950901804 135% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.