More people put their personal information online (addresses, telephone number …) for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays an increasing number of Internet users leave their digital footprints for daily activities, such as communicating on social webpages or making payment with individual bank accounts. In my opinion, this is completely a positive trend.
That the uploading of personal data can cause harm to users might be reasonable. The primary reason is that there are various types of nuisances. The users can be frequently harassed with unwanted information. One particular example is the everyday annoying emails announcing huge rewards or marketing current products, which bothers the recipients a great deal. Also, the users’ personal names or other details could be hacked for the purpose of identity theft and online deception. Their prestige would be destroyed and their friends might lose some sums of money if an emergency letter calling for financial support is sent to all the friend list. Hence, unprotected data are posted on media pages in a quotidian fashion is a favorable target for cyber criminals.
However, I totally believe that this is a positive development. Firstly, it brings general convenience. In today’s society, where every application is digitally standardized, the need for existing personal information is highlighted. Shoppers, for instance, can just fill a typical form before purchasing items, and their information is then saved for later time. By doing that, they can spare plenty of time for the future’s shopping activity. Also, unlike the paper forms which have to be written on several times, each piece of information is inserted to the database, which allows staff members to control and manage the data of customers more easily and systematically. Finally, it can create individual appearance. In other words, one user could gain trust from others with their available personal details uploaded on their pages. People regularly think that if there are many facts and figures associated with a user whom they are searching, then that person is automatically assumed to be reliable. The more items of personal information produced, the more trustworthy and sincere he or she is.
In summary, I strongly believe that personal data which are daily presented by Internet users is a positive trend because of the above reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-18 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-24 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-24 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | gobidea | 89 | view |
- In many countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvanatages 84
- The diagram below shows the changes to the town of Seaville Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below shows the number of visitors to a local cinema according to age in 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- Topic Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 701, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a quotidian fashion" with adverb for "quotidian"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rotected data are posted on media pages in a quotidian fashion is a favorable target for cyber crimina...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, for instance, in summary, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34636871508 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83848915662 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617318435754 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0544807044 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225931789688 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553876241984 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043821130011 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125307525692 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562967541139 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.