Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people may believe that reading books is far more beneficial for kids than watching TV or playing video games. Personally, while there is some truth in the role of watching television and playing video games, I still support that reading books should be a priority.
On the one hand, watching television and playing computer games can be beneficial to a certain extent. Firstly, the visualized pictures being on TV and games enable kids to remember all events for a long time. This is because children are usually impressed by vivid images and sounds. Secondly, both watching TV and playing games are wonderful ways which help young people improve their mental health. For instance, if children watch an emotional family film, they will have a tendency of loving and sharing more with their parents and siblings.
On the other hand, there are various reasons why I am convinced that reading stories from books is more vital. The first reason is that reading books can enhance the ability of kids’ imagination and creativity. This means that children have to use their imagination to visualize all events described in books, which eventually help them create their own thoughts and opinions in their minds. The second reason is that children can develop their verbal ability through books. For example, when reading stories, kids are exposed to a wide range of vocabulary and sentence structures, and therefore, reading books can provide great opportunities for children to advance their ability to describe things, which leads to better writing skill.
In conclusion, despite the mentioned advantages of watching television and playing computer games, reading books is far more significant down the road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-13 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve their mental health. For instance, if children watch an emotional family film,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24275362319 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52582492176 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557971014493 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7132708271 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.307692308 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351834015299 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125225493986 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083449152331 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212450712009 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652486875578 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.