Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
A developed economy means a higher standard of living and life quality. Many authorities pursue economic growth as their priority goal. However, others, me included believed that other types of progress are crucial for the nation.
On one hand, financial growth has a fundamental role to play in reducing the poverty of a country. It creates more job opportunities, better salaries for citizens so they can earn their living, pay their bills, and have savings. Moreover, people with higher earnings tend to have more cautious about their living. For example, if they have more money, they will invest in their education, medical care, and perhaps invest in the economy again. Eventually, all of which will boost people's living standard and their life quality.
On the other hand, when chasing to meet the economy target, the impact of which on the environment can not be overlooked. For instance, in some Asia nations, during 21 century, the time when they are in the break-neck of economic growth. And no doubt, along with the development of the economy, their environment deteriorates quickly such as high polluted air which is evidenced in India and China, polluted water found in Vietnam. In addition, a successful nation can be measured by the consideration of human rights. Humans are crucial entities to every development in every aspect. Yet, if these factors are being trivialized, for example, working people are ill-treated with slavery contract or the situation in which the rich is prioritized, massive protests will rise against the government, which leads to terrible ramifications, or worse the deterioration of the economy.
In a nutshell, there are many obvious benefits of economic growth. Nevertheless, a nation that meets its target, is the one that archives various types of progress such as democracy, well-being, social policies.
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to AShdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking vistors how satisfied they were with their visit during the samw two periods 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...stance, in some Asia nations, during 21 century, the time when they are in the break-ne...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27946127946 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81827232757 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2764335809 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150189784967 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050965800388 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04663757113 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105261962425 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467543153288 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.