Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is widely believed that thanks to revolutionary advancements in technology humans now can reach substantial resources which provide them with numerous options and opportunities in their lives. Nevertheless, not everyone in every class of society can attain such diverse options therefore I only partly agree with that belief
Firstly, it is undeniable that more choices will enhance greater convenience for humans. Take Vietnam in the 20th century as an example, Vietnamese people did not have sustainable food, therefore, their options were only a little rice or corn with salt for seasoning, maybe some fish were added to a little more wealthy family. Consequently, the lack of food had led to the lack of nutrients and balance. In comparison to nowadays living conditions, Vietnamese have more choices in their meals such as fish, chickens, and many nutritious vegetables which provide the energy to create productivity. Not only in food that people have diverse options, in terms of gadgets, electronics, thanks to foreign trade but huge amounts of brands and diverse functions also enable customers to have more options which they consider to suit their finances and demand.
On the contrary, putting the developed countries in comparison with undeveloped countries, it can be spotted the unequal distribution of technology which contributes a large proportion in creating options and raising humans’ standard of life. Many undeveloped countries are lacking basic needs like food, clean water, healthy service, and financial resources. As a result, people in these countries are not able to avail their fundamental human rights. Take the Covid-19 pandemic as an example, shortage in oxygen is a common title in every newspaper recently. Moreover, undeveloped countries are not able to provide vaccines to their civilians which has caused the escalation in new positive cases daily. Consequently, medical service is on the edge of collapse. Medical staff have to choose who has a higher chance of surviving, will be able to attain the ventilator.
In conclusion, indeed, we are now living in an era that has plenty of choices to enjoy our lives. However, each individual lives in different conditions, which means to some people many choices are out of reach.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-01 | trpg143 | 89 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-19 | minhnhat230602 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 89 | view |
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to AShdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking vistors how satisfied they were with their visit during the samw two periods 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun rice seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little rice'.
Suggestion: little rice
...d, therefore, their options were only a few rice or corn with salt for seasoning, maybe ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32590529248 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87720136987 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565459610028 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6265855168 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.466666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112146259752 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370586910696 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339620368819 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.055197763684 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459615878951 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.