Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is always argued that if college people should major in a relatively useful topic prior to their interests. In my opinion, the advantages of picking up a more appealing subject that one can be buried himself in overweigh the disadvantages.
On the one hand, offenders may suggest that the majors, which have a direct relationship with science and technology, will definitely pave a brighter road for students before facing the advent of a competitive job market. It does not always make the sense. The true phenomenon is crude that graduators who studied the most popular subjects from even top universities still can not find a hopeful job. However, in the meantime, those with lower education but subjected to faculties less relevant to science, such as painting, sometimes lead a good performance.
On the other hand, It is agreeable that interest often stimulates creativity and innovation. For instance, I have played the flute over a period of 10 years, since there is no passion for me to go further and the mere accomplishment of mine is a certificate. I experienced a period full of a rough time but gain nothing. People who achieve high awards may well not lack of interest. In order to reach the peak of the mountain called science, only the responsibility for society is not enough obviously, but whole-hearted input. In the case of that, people should not restrict students to comply with the rules they sign to help select subjects.
In conclusion, although useful subjects own a large number of merits, it is undeniable that people will never lead a progressive living without interests.
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents for instance for sport or music and others are not However it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician Discuss both these views and 61
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries over a twenty year period
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 561, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing, sometimes lead a good performance. On the other hand, It is agreeable that ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s they sign to help select subjects. In conclusion, although useful subjects ow...
^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...onclusion, although useful subjects own a large number of merits, it is undeniable that people wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01115241636 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92060376319 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0217920386 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198782090784 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533393988182 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457991612661 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103411791299 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224024448595 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.