The provided pie chart elucidates the distribution of visitors to four different types of tourist attractions in Britain during 1999.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that theme parks had the most proportion of visitors, whereas wildlife parks and zoos had the least percentage of tourists.
Theme parks were the tourist attraction that has the most number of people who came to visit when it occupied 38% of the graph. Most of the tourists who came to theme parks went to the Blackpool Pleasure Beach (47%). Meanwhile, 17% of visitors came to the Alton Towers, 16% of individuals visited Pleasureland, Southport. Otherwise, Chessington World of Adventures and Legoland, Windsor had the same proportion of visitors (10%) who came to theme parks.
Museums and Galleries took the second place of the percentage of tourists which was just lower than theme park 1%. The third position went to the proportion of individuals who came to historic houses and monuments which was 16%. Ultimately, wildlife parks and zoos were the tourist attractions that had the least percentage of visitors (9%).
- As computers can translate all languages very quickly and accurately learning a foreign language is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
- The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages 67
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 73
- Should government funding be spent on education and the health care system 89
- In developing countries children in rural communities have less access to education Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, second, so, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23333333333 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79448310112 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538888888889 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4403198986 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206460790811 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976857821024 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101757262233 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143665566413 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123663748017 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.