Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
Wilderness is an area of land that has been undisturbed by human interactions. In the quest for civilization and modernization and as the population of human race grew exponentially over the past centuries, there have been significant decline in the wilderness areas. These decline in area has had telling effects on the habitats of some species of animals and plants who call those places home. It is therefore paramout that nations across the world pass laws to preserve the remaining wilderness areas for the following underlisted reasons.
The evil practices of poaching has rendered some species of animals extinct and some almost extinct. These animals are actively hunted for some of their valuable body parts which sells for hundreds and tens of thousands of dollars in a global black market of animal parts. Through an organized syndicate of poachers, various groups synonymous to drug cartels, hunt down elephants, deers, bears for their tusks, horns and furs respectively. Some of these poachers are in it for the financial rewards while others hunt just for the sheer fun of it. It has been reported by the International Organization for wildlife conservation in a 2009 study that the African Elephant species indigent to Kenya will go extinct by the year 2030. It is as a result of this that the Kenya government has in 2019 passed laws prohibiting illegal poaching and a had established forest reserves across several part of the country.
The ability of government to preserve any remaining wilderness areas has several benefits to that particular government. When a country is able to preserve areas of land that has little to no human interaction, it serves as a way of generating revenue for that country. Humans by default love aesthetically pleasing scenes which is greatly found in natural settings. By setting up wilderness parks and naturals forest reserves, government can generate revenues for tourists who want to have a feel of nature. For example, the South African Ministry of Culture and Tourism in a 2018 report said that the government generates between seven to ten million dollars annually for tourist who travel from across the globe to visits various reserves and natural parks.
Another reason why nations should strive to preserve wilderness areas is that is serves as means of national pride and also as a means of national identity. Several countries in South America and Asia have pride themselves from being home to some of the worlds iconic landscapes, plant species and some rare animal breeds. Should they have chosen to destroy these areas, they wont have the bragging rights they enjoy today. For example, Brazil is home to the Amazon forest which houses over a million species of insects and plants. Some iconic birds, mammals and reptiles are found only in this part of the world. This has made Brazil easily attributed to the Amazons and each time someone asks me of Brazil, I first think of the Amazon rain forest. Also another example of countries whose identity can be attributed to the wilderness ares it houses is China. The Himalayas mountain area has for years given China and border India an identity peculiar to that region.
In conclusion, it is extremely important for nations to pass laws to preserve their remaining wilderness areas because it will of numerous advantages to both the countries and to humanity at large. Conserving wilderness areas will provide a national heritage for further generations to inherit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 880, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun part seems to be countable; consider using: 'several parts'.
Suggestion: several parts
... had established forest reserves across several part of the country. The ability of govern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 242, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ave pride themselves from being home to some of the worlds iconic landscapes, plant species...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 750, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... first think of the Amazon rain forest. Also another example of countries whose iden...
^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: MODAL_OF[2]
Message: It's never correct to use "of" after a modal verb. Use 'will have'.
Suggestion: will have
...r remaining wilderness areas because it will of numerous advantages to both the countri...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2911.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 573.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08027923211 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67803421242 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502617801047 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4202655713 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.44 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.92 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28039659562 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827106993439 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107890894447 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182334665061 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994279477096 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.