It is widely believed that the old who are at a particular age, typically 65 should be dismissed from companies' operative system because of lack of strong health and other relevant consequences. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint due to numerous enormous contribution brought by elderly employees for the development and property of their workplace.
There are some reasons for people should be forced to leave their current positions when reaching at a retirement age. Firstly, according to natural life-circle, people, in general, are unable to combat aging, which leads to grave heath-related problems such as cardiovascular, diabetes, memory degradation diseases. If the old continue to devote at work, they might be regarded as deterrent, causing work's productivity and quality decline. Secondly, the existence of old generation can take the important places of youngsters, who have both good physical heath and vital characteristics like creativity and determination. In reality, some companies are controlled by the old managers have a tendency to promote with a lower rate compared to other firms run by young leaders.
Despite these arguments mentioned above, I contend that age discrimination should not be appeared at the working environment and elderly staff can go on making meaningful contribution regardless of their high age. This is mainly because their plentiful practical experience throughout working process. In comparison with the young, older people are
senior consultants in terms of planning long-term company's strategies and addressing pressing concerns, which also are chief weapon to overcome business challenging obstacles. Besides that, strengthening working age for old employees will become not only a driving force but also a valuable recognition for their endeavor during contributed years. This is one of the most crucial factors making success for organizations.
In conclusion, I would argue that due to the contribution and experience from old generation, leaders or managers should consider removing age limit at the workplace.
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 78
- Fossil fuels are the main sources in many countries but in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is it positive or negative development 73
- The workplace nowadays is trying to employ the equal number of females and males Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 305, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...perience throughout working process. In comparison with the young, older people are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...parison with the young, older people are senior consultants in terms of planning ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, in general, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64126984127 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14037740878 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4071255496 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.692307692 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29401360517 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954073735684 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809614842531 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147029500442 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576229009968 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.69 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.