The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000

The line graph gives information about three different fuels like petroleum, coal and natural gas which are consumed in the European country from the year 1981 to the end of 19th century.

The natural gas is depicted in the grey color, it shows a steady rate till 1990's and a minor increase till 1997 with different rates and a sudden major increase from 1997 resulting in huge 80 tonnes production to the end of the year 2000.

Coal had a steady rate production till 1983 but suffered a steep decrease till the mid 1985, although it managed to regain its production it was able to settle at near 70's by 1987, after going through alot of changes , it's production subsided continuously and finally took a near 40 ton production at end of 2000.

Where as petroleum started at 100 ton production in 1981, declined only at period 1987-1988 and less variations at the end of century but managed to maintain its importance and remained the most produced fuel throughout the period finalizing a value of 120 ton at the end of given period

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...987, after going through alot of changes , its production subsided continuously an...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...r 40 ton production at end of 2000. Where as petroleum started at 100 ton production...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun variations is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., declined only at period 1987-1988 and less variations at the end of century but ma...
^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d of century but managed to maintain its importance and remained the most produce...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70491803279 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53071280969 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 22.4926829268 200% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.3657936976 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 215.25 112.824112599 191% => OK
Words per sentence: 45.75 22.9334400587 199% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207449849909 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124309587427 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611516453494 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124309587427 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611516453494 0.0819641961636 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.6 13.2329268293 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.87 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.9970731707 182% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.