The table shows basic idea of approximate number of speakers using some common languages as native language and additional language.
Overall, tables explains about six different languages, like Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, Spanish, English, Arabic, Portuguese. Among the languages given Chinese had the largest number of users whereas Portuguese has the lowest.
Mandarin Chinese has 900 million native speakers and 190 million additional speakers making it a huge number of 1090 million users in total. Hindi and Spanish has a nearly equal number of users with 370 and 350 million of native and 120 and 70 million of additional users, making them 490 and 420 million of total users respectively.
English had a unique quality of having additional users nearly double of the native users with 603 million and 339 million in number, making 942 million in total and stands 2nd most used language in the list given. Arabic and Portuguese had less speakers compared to other languages with 206 and 203 million native and 24 and 10 million additional users making to a number of 230 and 213 million users in total sequentially.
- The process shows how plants create food 78
- Most of our information comes from the Internet nowadays Some people say that a large part of the information we get is incorrect Do you agree or disagree 56
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- Consumption of fast food by Australian teenager 75
- The table below gives information about a restaurant s average sales in three different branches in 2016 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: million
...e native users with 603 million and 339 million in number, making 942 million in total and stands...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun speakers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...e list given. Arabic and Portuguese had less speakers compared to other languages wi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1693989071 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52963562724 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2234096981 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.142857143 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142976322541 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861731473166 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362485539438 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105703831223 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322680301276 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.