Governments should offer free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
High education fees rose dramatically during the last decades, making them simply not affordable for many people seeking to get a degree. To deal with the problem, it has been suggested that governments would subsidize education in the university, allowing poor students who have been admitted to study for free. Although the policy seems reasonable at first, there are several good reasons to object to it and to consider instead other strategies to assist these students.
First, in deciding whether to finance free university education, one must consider the policy's alternative costs. High education is indubitably important, but it is hardly the most vital thing the government may have to pay for. One may disagree about the specific order of priorities, but there's little doubt that high education is not the first thing on the list. Providing the poor people with food, cloth, and shelter and holding an army and an effective police force is, for sure, more important. Financing high education, especially in cases of budget deficit may hurt financing other things.
Second, the fact that there are students who cannot afford the tuition does not mean that the government should intervene. Many private organizations deal with the problem, by giving those students stipends and financial aid. These organizations possess the relevant knowledge and the experience, which government officials may not have, to use the money effectively. If the government takes the duty, it is more than likely that the financial aid programs will be handled inefficiently, which may harm the students.
Assisting students to get high education is important, and it may pay off in the long run. Some talented scientists did not have the means to afford high education, and the assistance they had received allowed them to study and excel, to the benefit of society at large. The examples of such success stories are scarce, however, and cannot justify massive government expenses.
Wide-spread university education is essential for economic and scientific progress, and it is in the interest of society as a whole that students who cannot afford tuition costs get the opportunity to obtain an academic degree. Nevertheless, making the government responsible for the program may cut its expenses on more important things, while jeopardizing the quality of the assistance programs' organization.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Afolakemi | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 83 | view |
- Scientific theories which most people consider as fact almost invariably prove to be inaccurate Thus one should look upon any information described as factual with skepticism since it may well be proven false in the future 83
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situat 43
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a controlled laboratory study of liquid hand soaps a concentrated solution of extra strength UltraClean hand soap produced a 40 percent greater reduction in harmful bacter 85
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 55
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...t the specific order of priorities, but theres little doubt that high education is not...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35013262599 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82105934742 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554376657825 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4282744395 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 118.647058824 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1764705882 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58823529412 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279462570081 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860360665343 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106072262769 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150324898912 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056934913151 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.