The pie charts illustrates the world expenditure on five different groups (food, clothing, housing, transport, and other) and total population.
Overall, it can be seen that people spend more money on food rather than other kinds of demand. Moreover, Asia accounts for the largest fraction in terms of the number of dwellers.
Regarding world spending, world citizens allocate the highest budget to food, at nearly one-quarter, followed by transport costs with 18%. Furthermore, accommodation demand is met, taking up 12% of the inhabitants' incomes. This figure is double than that of clothing. Apart from 4 basic requirements served for people's lives, 40% of the rest is distributed to other demands such as entertainment, health care and education.
As for the world population, there was a significant difference among nations. It is obvious that Asia is a dominated region in terms of population, reaching at over half of the total and this figure is 5 times as much as the number of African citizens, which takes up only 10%. Meanwhile, The European countries and the US have the same percentage of people, at 14%. Besides that, other continents are also responsible for the minimum fraction, at 5% in the examined year.
- The charts show average levels of participation in education and the highest education level of adults from 2000 to 2010 in Singapore 73
- The table below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport 89
- Music has always been an important part of human culture To what extent do you agree with this statement and why 84
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in London 2000 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of part time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, well, while, apart from, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.135 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90240848262 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7895158666 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3636363636 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714201343658 0.215688989381 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0253856168878 0.103423049105 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235068290242 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0435397777229 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135427077137 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.