The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Overall, by far the biggest majority of having healthy weight was shown in 1955. In any case, the weight issues experienced some changes in the latest year.
In 1955, the youngest aged 20-29 made up the fewest weight issues, presenting with 70% showing a healthy weight. Also, cohorts aged 30 to 60s in Charlestown consisted of having steady ideal weight, representing more than a half. This contrasted to each age group in the latter constituting significant underweight problem, affecting more than a fifth, with the highest proportion accounting for elderly, at 40%. However, overweight and obesity issues took up only less than a half, showing the lowest.
Apart from previous comparison, in the modern year, obesity issue presented a dramatic increase in almost each bracket in Charlestown, representing from 10% to 60%, with elderly consisting of the highest. The older inhabitants’ ages were, the less they had the healthy weight. It was showed only less 10% of elderly having ideal weight.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-07 | Jenil | 61 | view |
| 2021-11-11 | endriksugianto.es | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Mohsensnake | 11 | view |
| 2021-03-26 | anna103 | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-04 | Nurbakyt2oo1 | 84 | view |
- The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, apart from, in any case
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24844720497 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77481995561 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645962732919 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8247830789 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092165204298 0.215688989381 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425751665134 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278636668336 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068739972433 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00743360975181 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.