Many people are travelling to other countries. Why? Is it a positive or negative
development?
In this integrating world, the development in tourism has facilitated people
with various choices in terms of travelling destinations. In particular, there has
been an increasing trend of travelling abroad, which gains controversial
opinions. From my point of view, I believe that there are several reasons for this
growing trend and the problems seem to outweigh the benefits.
Admittedly, there are certain resonales for people choosing to visit foreign
nations. It is obvious that this can be an opportunity for them to open their
horizons and gain a wealth of experience. As diƋerent countries have diƋerent
cultures, traditions and the like, when tourists go outside the border, they can
get access to many diverse ways of living as well as widen their knowledge
about the world. Moreover, this can also be a chance for people to get away
from the hustle or bustle lifestyles in the city and they can enjoy themselves in
a whole diƋerent world. By travelling to a strange place, people can experience
diƋerent feelings, new beauty that they have never seen and live their lives to
the fullest.
However, I believe that there are glaring detriments when people just spend
time and money on going to foreign countries. The first thing to notice is that
when people just keep going out, they can not contribute to the economic
growth of their mother nation through tourism's revenues. For example, by
flying to France and having a guided tour there, people of other countries
have brought their money to France's national budget, without fostering
anything to their homeland. That can be the prerequisite for the future's
economic recession in general and the slowing down of tourism in the country
in particular Another thing worth considering is that when people travel to
other countries too much, they may soon blend in that culture and may decide
to stay in that county. If all the gifted men or scientists gather in one country,
the gap between the developing and developed nations will be much wider
and the conflicts, together with misunderstandings can also become more
serious.
In conclusion, while making cross-border trips can, to some extent, bring a
myriad of benefits, I am convinced that this development will pose more
disadvantages including the loss of revenues, the mitigation in economy and
the gap between nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | Tung lam | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | tran quynh | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | tran quynh | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-23 | Ieltsbg | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-01 | Lê Quang Minh | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 16, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... when people just spend time and money on going to foreign countries. The first thing t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 22, column 38, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...g anything to their homeland. That can be the prerequisite for the futures econo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, another thing, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 1.00243902439 1297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 5.60731707317 589% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 965.302439024 209% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 385.0 196.424390244 196% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23896103896 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 3.73543355544 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75679261987 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 106.607317073 204% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566233766234 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 283.868780488 208% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 1.53170731707 588% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 14.0 3.36585365854 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.3149873969 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.071428571 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 5.23603664747 195% => OK
Paragraphs: 31.0 3.83414634146 809% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189969887521 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654901378379 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485114995957 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0456026328161 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537674612317 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 40.7170731707 226% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.