In many countries, people have children later in life than in the past. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? What is the cause of this?
Globally, the issue of whether it is good to have babies later in life has been a topic of discussion for many years. Some people believe that it is beneficial to give birth when young people are older enough to be responsible, while others argue that it may be risky to have a baby when the mothers are older. This essay will compare the benefits and drawbacks and discuss the main reason for the phenomenon.
There are various advantages of having children later in life when people are mentally and financially ready. Without sufficient money and a sense of responsibility, young people cannot raise and educate children. In countries like India, for example, it is not uncommon to see indigent pregnant underages who are not able to live a decent life, let alone support the family. In this case, having children when people are mature with enough savings would be a better way.
Conversely, when it comes to the disadvantages, the higher risks of delivering babies and the lower possibility of pregnancy when parents are older cannot be ignored. To be more specific, it is significantly difficult for women over 35 to have a baby and give birth safely based on medical evidence. For instance, couples in China tend to have babies before 30 because it is easier and safer for the mothers considering their health condition. Thus, people need to take those things into consideration when they decide to have children later.
This essay has discussed whether it is rewarding to have children later in life because people can get ready for parents’ role, or it is harmful due to the risks pregnant women will undergo. On balance, this essay believes that advantages are stronger since irresponsible parents will pose a detrimental impact on their children. The primary reason for this later pregnant phenomenon is the increasing financial burden on parents. All over the world, parents and children will be much happier and healthier if governments can more family supports.
- 7 Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 78
- Is relating well to others more important than studying hard 63
- 5 The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries parents expect children to spend long time studying in and after school and have less free time Do you think it has positive or negative effects on children and society that they live in 67
- Young people today are better qualified than they were in the past Some people argue that this is because competition for jobs is greater than it used to be Others say that people only continue their education because the opportunities exist for them to d 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...governments can more family supports.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01812688822 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67619834586 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537764350453 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.540572965 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.733333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269755831843 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103565120291 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731661075471 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180781296941 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713023524743 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.