Some people like to do only what they already do well. Other people prefer to try new things and take risks. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
Nowadays, many people do not want to engage in new things since we think we can predict what will happen when we do these new things. Some people might say that trying new things means taking risks, so we should not engage in new things. Rather, we should do the same things that we already know not to take additional risks in life. However, I personally prefer to try new things and take risks in terms of accomplishment and growing self-esteem. The following reasons could explain why:
To begin with, we cannot achieve anything unless we take risks.People nowadays do not want to take risks because, if we follow precedence, we can live a stable life without feeling imminent fear. In Japan, for example, many people extremely dislike trying new things because we were taught by our teacher that people should ride the same train that was already guaranteed. So we normally think trying new things is taboo, and it feels like a deviation. In other words, many Japanese are always concerned about other people’s lenses, and if we do other things, we will be seen as strange. On the other hand, I think trying new things can gain a great deal more achievement than doing the same things. For example, I started trying new things positively, such as surfing, making music, and studying psychology. These new experiences gave me a sense of accomplishment.
Secondly, engaging in new things increases self-value. Generally, self-value reflects an affluence of experiences. Some people who have tried a lot of things so far have a large number of perspectives, and they are good at communicating with many people because they know many things. For example, people have their own preferences and hobbies. If we can match someone who has the same hobby as me, we can enjoy speaking. On the other hand, if we don't know much about other people's hobbies, we may find it difficult to share our own thoughts or communicate effectively.If we have a variety of knowledge, we can relatively enjoy speaking with many people, and many people like talking with you.
We cannot feel accomplishments or have deep relationships unless we take risks.These are two reasons I think trying new things is much better than doing the same things without taking any risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-15 | WatermelonUCLA | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-30 | Isidora | 80 | view |
| 2020-05-20 | Punits000 | 88 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | Kamalkhan | 74 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | helenebissay | 70 | view |
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Are enough public funds invested in social welfare 66
- qqq 56
- Agree or disagree Gender inequality will never be eliminated 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children should be given a modest weekly allowance for doing household chores Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion Do not use memorized examples 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: People
...t achieve anything unless we take risks.People nowadays do not want to take risks beca...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... have tried a lot of things so far have a large number of perspectives, and they are good at comm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 448, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...njoy speaking. On the other hand, if we dont know much about other peoples hobbies, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: If
...own thoughts or communicate effectively.If we have a variety of knowledge, we can ...
^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: These
...deep relationships unless we take risks.These are two reasons I think trying new thin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90078328982 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72064918329 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514360313316 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8326345174 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.277777778 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307612726975 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120162059144 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062092055592 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221512643096 0.150856017488 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673056350287 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.