People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?
Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is true that citizens have suffered lots of daily issues. Personally, governments should encourage people leave the city to move in rural areas. This essay will provide my answer with suitable examples and explanations.
First of all, there are a lot of problems that city people must face. The first problem is the bills since living in the large city, they must pay many kind of bills like electricity bill, water bills, and taxes, and so on. This creates a financial burden for them and if they do not work hard enough, they might not able to pay all of these bills. For example, in Vietnam, many people must work in factories or offices for more than 8 hours per days to pay all the daily fees. Secondly, another issue is the unemployment problem because of migration, people go to big cities to look for jobs that have well-paid. Therefore, factories and companies in these cities can not hire all of them and as a result, many people turn to unemploy and this leads to lots of disadvantages. For example, these unemployed people will use drugs or do crimes. This makes the reputation in the city fall dramatically.
Fortunately, governments have solutions to solve this circumstance by helping them move to regional towns in which do not overcrowded. With this solution, governments can control the number of people in every area and they can help areas where are lacking of people forces by moving people to theses places to work. This is not only removes the unemployment problem but also solves the overpopulation in the country.
In conclusion, residents who are living in the large cities must suffer many problems in their daily lives. In my opinion, governments need to focus on this issues by encourage them to move out the city and go to other areas to improve their benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | songuyen14 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-03 | Mary Nhuy Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-19 | erbol | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-27 | Diyorbek Zaripboyev | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | buiminhduc | 61 | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Online shopping is replacing conventional shopping stores Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 67
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 100
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...living in the large city, they must pay many kind of bills like electricity bill, water b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78205128205 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62720431226 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532051282051 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2017669748 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283397316985 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100813169976 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589892067466 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176549709341 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146030003508 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.