People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life What are those problems Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns

Essay topics:

People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?
Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns?

Urbanites are currently struggling with various forms of issues originating from the downsides of densely populated metropolitan areas. Within this essay, I will take a deep dive into these problems and give reasons for the support of governmental relocation stimulous program to suburban and rural regions

To begin with, the alarming problems associated with urban areas can be cultivated in form of crowdedness and stressful lifestyle. First of all, large urban population is cramped into a small area, which results in high level of density. Hence, there is a limitation in the capability of supplying suitable living space, which renders the construction of comfortable housing plans with convenient facilities impossible. For example, Hong Kong is a city, whose high level of population density creates a housing crisis, where many people squeeze themselves into tiny rooms with limited ventilation and lighting. Moreover, due to a extreme rate of competitiveness, urbanites are forced to work round the clock to generate more value for the capitalised filled environment. Therefore, it leaves them little time to relax and refresh physically and mentally. As a result, exhaustion and depression cases are climbing at dangerous rate in cities, where suicidal thought is becoming dangerously prevalent.

Thus, it is reasonable to support a governmental scheme that facilitates the relocation of urban population, which promises more ample living space and lesser financial burden. Specifically, unlike the scarity of land within many cities, there is a vast area of undeveloped real estate with tremendous possibility for housing projects filled with infrastructures to support a rewarding lifestyle. For instance, Vinhome Smart City project differs from its competitors in the heart of Hanoi by locating themself on the outskirt of city, where the developers have ample land to develop spacious apartments surrounded by parks and other natural features. Additionally, the relocation away from the crowded metropolitan areas is likely able to ease the excessive demand for money as the living cost in these suburban and rural areas are generally cheaper. Hence, residents are not required to work tirelessly to maintain and generate income to sustain their livelihood, instead, they would have the chance to enjoy their life.

In conclusion, urban inhabitants have to face with a cramped living area due to the dense population accompanying with taxing tiredness. Therefore, it is advisable to relocate out of the city to enjoy better living conditions with less worries.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-30 songuyen14 89 view
2022-06-03 Mary Nhuy Tran 78 view
2022-05-19 erbol 73 view
2022-01-27 Diyorbek Zaripboyev 84 view
2021-11-17 buiminhduc 61 view
Essays by user songuyen14 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...tilation and lighting. Moreover, due to a extreme rate of competitiveness, urbani...
^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun worries is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... to enjoy better living conditions with less worries.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 395.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54683544304 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00153675322 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592405063291 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.2413845254 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.066666667 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114876713506 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.033677831036 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286528891162 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705828914837 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144263401944 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.