Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world more people share the same language. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this?
Today’s world has seen the spreading migration and increased urbanization bridge the gap between countries in aspects such as cultures whilst this assimilation causes the unstoppable loss of certain languages, especially those spoken by small proportions of population. In my opinion, while major language speakers would definitely embrace a more user-friendly environment for accessing knowledge and expanding their economic colonies, with mounting minor speakers willing to or feeling obliged to cease their own languages, consequences of losing what we can trace back to our humanity would be born by all.
Luck as people who speak a dominant language as native speakers or shifters, inter-generational language transmission will help them leverage their own resources. Seeking a vast global market has proven to be the key to business expansion and profit maximization in the scenario when native industries combat the global competition. For example, as more people in not-English-speaking regions use universal languages, such as English, it will facilitate a further penetration of corporations and foreign capitals of many western countries through the boarders into the developing countries like China. In addition, language unification should not be blamed just for the advocacy of diversity; instead, it has turned out to be favorable in some contexts. It can be justified by the facts that sharing a common language will not only empower students or workers to migrate across language regions, but for exchanging information and communication in elite natural sciences such as physics or chemistry, the use of an official languages also helps break linguistic constraints for all, since it is apparently impractical to require scientists to reach a high fluency of many different languages during each seminar.
On the other hand, the struggle all the dying languages have been put through has done more harm than good for us. Even for any language who only owns several speakers, the language itself holds the secret to a particular history, the backlog of our generational wisdom and the tales of societal changes, passed down orally or transcribed in hope that they are to be picked up and spread. However, as each of endangered languages disappears in succession, we will lose access to written and oral accounts of what has made us today. Unfortunately, the tribulations of this will reach our cultural identity. Various forms of arts like Peking Opera or River Dance can only identified and delivered by Chinese or Irish. Yet the loss of them eventually deprive their speakers of their belongings and origins.
In conclusion, agreeing on and establishing a universal language is literally impossible and controversial. It is true official languages speakers will appreciate the linguistic colonization, but in mu opinion, the greater influential results will be more likely to be detrimental and destructive for cultural preservation and perceived statelessness.
- It s more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Today advanced science and technology have made great changes to people s life but artists are still valued high such as musicians painters and writers What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 84
- More and more parents allow their young children to play a computer or laptop e g iPad because they think that children need good technology skills Do advantages of the development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Some people believe that if a police officer carries guns it can encourage a higher level of violence To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Full time students should take a lot of time to study but it is also essential to be involved in other activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'facilitate'
Suggestion: facilitate
...rsal language, such as English, it will facilitates a further penetration of corporations a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1134, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...e scientists to reach a high fluency of many different languages during each seminar. On th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, however, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2517.0 1615.20841683 156% => OK
No of words: 459.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48366013072 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2141847815 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 506.74238477 155% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 103.508969016 49.4020404114 210% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.8 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167251417839 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527731332354 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030881366633 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979034043019 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321919696345 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.1 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 147.0 78.4519038076 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 21.0 10.7795591182 195% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.