The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 to 2030
The line chart gives information about the proportion of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus and train from 1970 to 2030. It is clear that cars which were used daily by UK commuters were the most popular transport. In addition, while the number of people who used car and bus increased remarkably, the data of bus decreased gradually. In 1970, approximately 5 millions UK commuters went for work by car each day, meanwhile the bus and train were used by about 4 million and 2 million people respectively. Over the fifty-year period, the rate of UK commuters travelling each day by car jumped significantly to nearly 8 million people and the figures for train reached to 5 million. Commuters used bus for work reduced slightly by about 0,5 million people.
By 2030, the number of people who travelled by car and train will grow to 9 million people and 5 million people respectively. By contrast, buses are expected to become a less popular choice, with only 3 million users.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-20 | ngoc.tuyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-20 | ngoc.tuyen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | ngoc.tuyen | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 to 2030 73
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 62
- the graph below show the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005 78
- the graph below show the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005 73
- The graph below show the proportion of the population aged 54 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three differents countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 815.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76608187135 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76430713438 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2080034495 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350353141655 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176270703538 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122443631518 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248711179762 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131611574194 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.