The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015.
The bar chart illustrates how much waste collected by cycling centre in five years between 2011 and 2015.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the total amount of waste each year not only followed a similar trend but also fluctuated slightly. Additionally, waste paper was the most assembled type of waste, while the opposite was true for garden waste during the period.
Looking at the details, as regards the figures for collected waste in 2011, paper was number one with 57 tons of waste, just ahead of glass with 48 tons. Meanwhile, ranked third place was tins waste at 35 tons, as opposed to 32 tons of garden waste.
However, the amount of waste paper hit a trough of 40 tons in 2013 before increasing significantly to 70 tons in 2015. By contrast, for other gatherable waste such as glass, tins and garden, four-year period witnessed the same marginally fluctuations which ended with 52 tons, 39 tons and 35 tons respectively in 2015.
- The best way to ensure the growth of children is tomake parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows the number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 100
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to get news However others believe that they can get news better through other media platforms Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 75
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, so, third, while, as regards, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80120481928 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49191609252 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656626506024 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5507453126 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 5.23603664747 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224610615551 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114301356586 0.103423049105 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.09577802083 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161199821512 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106094459947 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.