The bar chart shows mobile usage in a country by age group from 1998 to 2000.
The chart illustrates the percentages in the use of mobile phones by different age demographics in a country between 1998 and 2000.
As can be seen from the chart, while the number of children aged less than 15 and the elderly aged 50 and above went through an upward trend, that of 16-to-30-year-olds and 31-50 age group experienced a downward trend. Moreover, mobile phones were used the most by people from 16 to 30 years old throughout the survey.
In particular, over half of mobile users in 1998 were people falling in the 16-to-30 age bracket, compared to 41% of 31-to-50 years old ones in 1998. Similarly, these two groups’ figures decreased, with the former going down to 45% and 44% in the next two years while the latter decreased by 2% each year. However, people aged between 16 to 30 still dominated the number of phone users surveyed in this nation.
By contrast, there was a mere 2% of mobile use by children aged 15 and below, which was only a half of the number for the elderly. Furthermore, the year 1999 saw the same level of these two groups at 8% before the figures increased marginally by 1% for the aged 15 and lower and by 2% for the 50-and-above people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
- The graph below shows trends in US meat and poultry consumption 56
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminum cans
- Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ular, over half of mobile users in 1998 were people falling in the 16-to-30 age brac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, still, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59624413146 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62977858651 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568075117371 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1878676452 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254739217988 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120104030029 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935267419104 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184144190746 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942944648171 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.