The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
Task 1:
The line graph compares the amount of water used for three different areas, namely: agriculture, industrial and domestic use from 1900 to 2000. The table illustrates the water consumption of Brazil and Congo in 2000.
Overall, the figure of all three sectors increased over the period shown. In addition, the number relating to agriculture was the highest in all ten years while the lowest figure is recorded in domestic uses. Turning to the given table, it is clear to see that Brazil has a higher population than Congo, which has led to the higher amount for water consumption per person in Brazil.
In the first year (1900), the amount of agriculture stood at the highest position with the number of nearly 500 m3. The figures for industrial and domestic use were at the same level with the number roughly 100 m3 in 1900. Then the water use of farming has a significant growth from around 500 to approximately 3000 m3 in 2000. Turning to the amount of industrial and domestic, it seems to remain stable in the period of the next two year from the beginning. However, between 1940 and 2000, the figure of industrial use rose substantially from nearly 100 to over 1000 m3. The amount domestic has a gradual climb from 100 to about 300 m3 during the same period at the usage in the home.
Moving to the table,since Brazil has a higher number of population than Congo with the figure of 176 millions. That has led to the irrigated land and water consumption of Brazil also surpassing the Democratic Republic of Congo with the number of 26500 km2 and 359 m3, respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , since
... usage in the home. Moving to the table,since Brazil has a higher number of populatio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 278.0 196.424390244 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70503597122 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55740976432 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467625899281 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1989458651 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15384615385 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167284278673 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681837260299 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758724022557 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125129481852 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997230745154 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.