The given line chart illustrates the consumption of people living in 6 different countries on renewable energy during the period of 40 years.
Overall, Finland ranked the highest among 6 nations mentioned, whereas, the inhabitants of the United Kingdom consumed the lowest amount of renewable energy.
As we can see from the picture, in the year 1971, the American usage accounted for only 2.5% of energy, this figure for Germany was doubled (5%), and France was slightly higher, with 7%. It is noticeable that these countries had a tendency to consume more renewable energy, even though their figure considerably fluctuated during the period shown. In particular, the consumption of people in the US reached a peak at 18% in 2011, in the same year, the amount used in Germany and France was 13% and 14% respectively.
Turning to the remaining nations, in 1971, there was 25% of renewable energy used in Finland, followed by Denmark with 15%, compared to the UK with only 1% of energy consumed. The next few years saw different trends among these countries. While the amount of power used in Finland slightly decreased by 24% in 2017, the figure for Denmark and the UK rose up to 17% and 7% respectively.
- The picture below shows the Use of renewable energy accounting for the total energy from 1971 to 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main feature and make comparison where relevant 84
- IELTS Task 1 Tables give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 78
- Sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas 1999 2004
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89268292683 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67382046581 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590243902439 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4471437495 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.375 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150428557754 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607767768329 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524041310872 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0839585698318 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393281546377 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.