RISE IN SEA LEVEL
The article and the lecture are both about the causes of the increase in sea level. The passage states that the rise of water in the sea level is unknown. The lecturer disputes this claim in the article. His position is that the increase in sea level is known.
According to the reading, the reason for the rise is in seawater is unknown. The lecturer challenges the argument. He claims that the melting of permafrost is responsible for the increase in sea level.
Secondly, the author state that NASA doesn't have a reason for the rise in sea level. The lecturer, however, asserts that NASA cannot fully
say that they cannot account for the increase in sea level when they indirectly have an explanation scientifically, and this rise in sea level is due to human activities.
Finally, the author state that the sea level fluctuates, and there is no need to be worried. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that something
must be done now before the sea level takes over all the land.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e of water in the sea level is unknown. The lecturer disputes this claim in the art...
^^^
Line 6, column 38, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... Secondly, the author state that NASA doesnt have a reason for the rise in sea level...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...no need to be worried. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that something must be done ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 1373.03311258 60% => OK
No of words: 174.0 270.72406181 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75287356322 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 4.04702891845 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50996823625 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 145.348785872 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48275862069 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 419.366225166 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9114196432 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1818181818 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06452816374 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.584442540311 0.272083759551 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243988554021 0.0996497079465 245% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15374939003 0.0662205650399 232% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320576557151 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108390747761 0.0443174109184 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.3589403974 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 63.6247240618 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.