Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people argue that wild animals are of no value to human existence, so the spending on protecting wild animals is pointless. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this statement because I think that wild animals play an important role in the ecosystem and the development of our society.
I believe that for a variety of reasons, wild animals are extremely important to our lives. First, the existence of one kind of wild animal is strongly linked with other living creatures such as plants and insects. Therefore, the disappearance of them could lead to the destruction of natural habitat and this also causes negative impacts on our lives. Furthermore, I think that wild animals are not as useless as people believe. There are many scientists and research implicate that the similarities between chimpanzee and human DNA could be a possibility for finding remedies curing cancers and genetic diseases.
I also disagree with the idea that spending on protecting wild animals is a waste of money and resources. In fact, the natural habitats of wild animals are being destroyed by human activities. The development of agriculture and intensive irrigation cause soil to lose its integrity which leads to erosion. Moreover, the industrialization and urbanization are the main factors for acid rains and water pollution. If the government do not interfere, the living environment of the wild animal will soon disappear. The protecting wild animals not only benefits them but also our existence.
In conclusion, I believe that protecting wild animals is crucial for the development and survival of human society, so we should do everything we can to protect them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97032418917 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540740740741 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2887797485 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268096359975 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103196908781 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810105684227 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18745483461 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511039861252 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.