Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that there is no importance to animals living in the wild and expenditure on saving them in the 21st century. I partly agree with the opinion, as wild animals and protecting them do not play as crucial a role as many exaggerate.
On the one hand, I hold a strong belief that people have no right to underestimate or eliminate the significance of wild animals and their natural habitats. People may peacefully live with wild animals and do not need to hunt or destroy all kinds of species and their environments in the world. In addition, it is true that the appearance of wild animals can contribute to the diversity of the ecosystem, meaning that it is beneficial for people’s lives. For example, children would have the opportunity to learn about the food chain of animals living in the wild or observe their lifestyle. Thus, it seems useful to protect and give wild animals a place to coexist with people not only in this century but also in the future.
On the other hand, I also think that if wild animals disappear, it will not have any seriously dramatic consequences for our lives and natural resources. Nowadays, people tend to face a variety of eco-social issues caused by overpopulation and a lack of natural resources. It is more necessary to allocate the power and resources of society to address the hottest issues, such as housing and agricultural land, than to focus these resources on protecting wild animals. Furthermore, the extinction of a wild creature might not always be a bad thing. Take the disappearance of dinosaurs as an example; it might generate a significant chance for other species, including humans, to evolve and develop. As a result, investing a variety of resources in protecting wild animals can be regarded as a waste to some extent.
In conclusion, I partly support the idea that wild animals and their protection are important, but I think that people should consider other eco-social fields to spend their money on and attempt to deal with, and the issues of wild animals should be invested reasonably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | Corn Cake | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-08 | Aung | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | ielts_tony | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Summarize
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People naturally resist making changes in their lives What kind of problems can this cause What solution can you suggest 61
- In some countries many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87535410765 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82196772372 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507082152975 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.9807740598 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.928571429 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317446608482 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114438060002 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746782877934 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199304345754 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690961424005 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.