Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree?
Notable amount people suggest that reading can lead a person to gain crucial skills such as imagination or literary ones in comparison with those who prefer to watch TV instead. This essay argues that reading may have significant benefits to individuals in terms of brain development and various masteries.
Reading has always been proved to have a major importance in cognitive growth alongside with a progress in linguistic competence. For instance, in a study conducted in Belgium, it was pointed out that people who have habits of reading frequently or even daily tend to have extensive vocabulary, low levels of stress, and increased rate of empathy. Additionally, reading was also proven to boost one’s comprehension and critical thinking which may be considered as quite pivotal traits. Moreover, nowadays, job requirements involve how a person can fulfil oneself aside from their profession and, experts tend to test individuals’ reading habits due to its massive and undeniable value in mental fitness.
Watching TV was regarded to take a huge place in people’s lives and the majority of the population mentioned that it is one of the best ways to relax from daily grind. Even though television seem to be extremely appealing, it was detected to have no profits to character. Furthermore, reading can encourage people to have a wide variety of imagination and unique ideas, while television is infamous for making humans lazier and addictive. It was reported in a survey that 8 out of 10 people who are keen on spending time watching screens were much likely to suffer from lack of focus and social skills while communicating. Conversely, active readers have a tendency to become less stressed about several occasions and possess analytical abilities on an advanced level.
In conclusion, reading and keeping oneself occupied with literary creations will be ultimately advantageous concerning new broad range of skills in comparison with other who decide not to adapt scholarly proneness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-04 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-13 | gurwindertoor | 87 | view |
| 2020-10-03 | mina123356789 | 56 | view |
| 2018-11-21 | namhero1997vn | 100 | view |
- Some old people today struggle with the use of modern technologies such as smartphones and computers What is the cause of this What are some possible solutions 84
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 78
- Some people argue that we should do research into their family history Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Some people say that relationships should be based on honesty and trust Others believe that it is sometimes necessary to be dishonest in order to maintain harmony Which approach do you consider to be better in relations 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...ance in cognitive growth alongside with a progress in linguistic competence. For instance,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32601880878 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91965167721 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639498432602 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.6108476639 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.583333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245423873163 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852208899135 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0859355852841 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158083136237 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0821273684031 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.