“The best way to teach-whether as an educator, employer, or parent-is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.”
Is the best way of teaching for educator, employer or parents to praise positive behaviour and simply turn a blind eye on negative behaviour? I concede that praising positive actions of people is a great way to keep their moral high, however I disagree with the last bit of the statement that says to ignore negative action. I believe that instead when a negative action is performed, a commensurate punishment should be given.
Childhood is considered to be the best time to learn something because a child’s mind is constantly being moulded through his parents, teachers and surrounding. So, if it is taught that one should simply ignore any negative action a child will start believing that there are no consequences to any wrongdoing and make them more likely to commit crimes in their adulthood. For example, if a child breaks a classrooms light and noone objects to it or punishes him; it would be an acceptable behaviour and is more likely to happen again.
As humans, we learn through consequences. If we commit a good deed and are praised for it by others, it gives us satisfaction which makes us highly likely to do it again. Similarly, if we perform a bad deed like stealing and are sent to jail it makes us less vulnerable to commit crime again. If an employer doesn’t pay attention when an employee is procrastinating or being a malingerer, every other employee would start trying to find ways to slack off in turn leading to no work getting done.
In almost every profession, learning through mistakes committed by ourselves as well as those who came before us guides us to new discoveries. For example, copernicus’s finding helped galileo to take the theory further. In the field of art, a novice artist develops various paintings and slowly learns from the ones he recieved praise for and abstains from techniques used in ones he was criticized for. So, looking back at our own mistakes and learning from them instead of merely ignoring is the best way to learn.
In sum, I believe that the best way of teaching is to praise good actions and give appropriate punishment for negative actions to embrace the method of learning through mistakes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-30 | sefeliz | 66 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
- Over the past two years the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically Many Central Plaza store owners believe that the decrease in their business is due to the number 50
- Although many people think that the luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life are entirely harmless in fact they actually prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals 50
- On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians the town council of Balmer Island should limit the numb 68
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 75
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than seek programs that promise entry into the job market 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, similarly, so, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1807.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85752688172 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77151841304 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545698924731 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6529906529 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.466666667 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308510559362 0.243740707755 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961616907792 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103552296366 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187499593858 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126043920591 0.0667264976115 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.