The line graph below shows the number of people in Great Britain living alone by age from 1996 to 2012.
The line graph provides information about how many people in five different demographic groups living by themselves in Great Britain from the year 1996 to 2012.
Overall, it is noticeable that there was a vast number of elderly has to lived alone. In contrast, the figure of the youngest group (16-24) was also the lowest.
There two visible pattern can be seen clearly. The figures of 65-74 group was surprisingly lower than 25-44 years old as well as 45-64 years old. However, over the next six years, the numbers of these three group experienced a dramatic change. Although the 45-64 demographic group and the 25-44 started at the same set point, after 1998 the mid age group exceeded the 25-44 group at around 1.6 million and by the year 2004 it also transcended the oldest group with approximately 2 million people and wind up at just below 2 million. The 75+ years old group, who had the biggest number in the first year with about 1.8 million people, also followed the same upward pattern and stopped at 2 million in 2012.
The figure of the 65 to 74 and 16 to 24 years old group hardly shifted over the 16 years, with just below 1.5 million and 0.3 million people, respectively. Regarding the 25-44 years old demographic, whilst the number slightly increased and hit its peak at about 1.8 million in 2002, after that it gradually dropped to the same level with the outset.
- the graph below shows the contribution of three sectors agriculture manufacturing and business and financial services to the UK economy in the twentieth century 78
- The graph below shows the changing patterns of access to modern technology in homes in the UK 78
- How should we ensure that the television is a positive influence in the life of children 73
- To what extent has the Internet made life more convenient Give reason to your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The graph shows the number of fatal injuries resulting in death of workers in New Zealand between 1992 and 2010
Comments
wiki [wiki](https:/…
wiki
[wiki](https://wikipedia.org/)
[url=https://wikipedia.org/]wiki[/url]
Links: https://wikipedia.org/
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pattern' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'patterns'.
Suggestion: patterns
...s also the lowest. There two visible pattern can be seen clearly. The figures of 65-...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, so, well, as to, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69672131148 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38528815241 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553278688525 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0767214252 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.6 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148616765284 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684774390537 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106323487513 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134289106885 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138638802136 0.0819641961636 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.