The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the change of different 5 categories of sources of energy produced by France in the course of ten years, namely coal, gas, petro, nuclear and other, starting in 1995.
Overall, it is immediately obvious that an upward trend was experienced in coal, gas, nuclear and other with the exception of petro, which was gone into a free-fall. Additionally, coal had remained the most prevalent over the surveyed year.
As is evidence, coal was accounted for 29.80 percent in 1995. Then, this figure was increased until reaching a peak of 30.93 percent in 2005. A similar trend was witnessed in gas, which was accelerated from 29.63 percent to a level of 30.31 percent in 2005. Not only coal and gas can be seen to move upward, but other and nuclear was also registered the same trend to approximately 9.10 percent and 10.10 percent, respectively.
In a contrast, petro, occupying 29.27 percent in 1995, was evidence to go into a free-fall. From then on, petro was declined considerably. As a result, only 19.55 percent of the total production belonged to petro in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-10 | khangoccho | 11 | view |
| 2021-11-13 | khangoccho | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...rienced in coal, gas, nuclear and other with the exception of petro, which was gone into a free-fall....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er the surveyed year. As is evidence, coal was accounted for 29.80 percent in ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcent and 10.10 percent, respectively. In a contrast, petro, occupying 29.27 pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9347826087 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73749088267 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597826086957 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2576977857 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0341053232351 0.215688989381 16% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171298002649 0.103423049105 17% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313418791766 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.034070472469 0.15604864568 22% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396452241838 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.