Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make. Has this become a positive or negative development?
In modern day, the development of technology affect many aspects of human life including the way people communicate. There are sevaral outstanding changes in the way people interact with one another which bring many benefits for the development of society. However, personally, I believe negative impacts of this tendency should be considered seriously.
On the one hand, there are several way in which the new communication technology has influenced people's way of interact with each other. Firstly, technology allow people to contact without meeting each other and social media applications has changed the way people communicate. We can connect with families and friends immediately through social media applications such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,... instead of sending letter or traveling long distance. Nowadays, we can talk to everyone easier with smartphone connected the Internet. In the past, we had to interact face to face, go out to meet others which waste both time and money. And now, by calling and sending message through phone, we can save time then have more time for other hobbies. Secondly, people are now more encouraged to share their opimions openly via the Internet. One good illustration for this is the substantial number of friends that people who use social media applications have in their contact list.
On the other hand, the impact of social media in one’s social life may not always be positive. This is because people are now increasingly abandoning face to face interactions which can make people feel more isolative, especially young people. They ofen prefer communicating behind the screen and closed door which can lead to decreasing self-confidence to speak in public. A good example here is that a research conducted in the US showing that more than 75% of high school students spending more than 50% of their free time on the Internet. Moreover, spending more time on social media can make people feel lonely, the relationship bond may be less strong. Clearly, physical connection always help relationship become closer.
In conclusion, modern technological advances in communication have incredibly influenced the way people interact, and although there are many perks associated with the use of recent technology, there are also drawbacks that people must take care of.
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 73
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements and this is a bad example to adolescents To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good member of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your opimion 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extend do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...There are sevaral outstanding changes in the way people interact with one another...
^^
Line 2, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ons such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,... instead of sending letter or travelin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33514986376 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85417628543 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547683923706 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.536153861 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.052631579 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375929398899 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115159976318 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119719658152 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249262374979 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855184176481 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.