The average prices per kilometre of clothing imported into the European Union from six different countries in 1993 and 2003 are shown in the bar chart below. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The comparison in imported clothing price averagely per kilometer from six different countries into European Union between 1993 and 2003 is displayed in the bar chart.
Overall, the average price in a kilometer of clothes imported into European nations was more dominated from countries from America continent than Asia one. Furthermore, only Argentina and Japan experienced a downward trend of price, while the rest nations showed some changes.
Initially, the vast majority of clothing brought into Europe was from Argentina, showing the maximum data recorded at almost 30 pounds, followed by Brazil and Japan importing it with the price more than 20 and at 15 pounds, running. Meanwhile, the remaining nations accounted for below Japan’s money.
Eventually, although the price of Argentina had decreased slightly by 2003, it was still the highest at around 25 pounds, and Japan also witnessed the former’s trend, declining to about 13 pounds. Turning to that of Brazil, it remained stable, then that of China exceeded Japan’s price to approximately 12 pounds. Even though the figure for India and Bangladesh increased quite dramatically, those only gained below the China’s pounds.
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 84
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 11
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 78
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901 78
- International travel is becoming cheaper than before so more and more countries open their doors to tourists Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh the disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wing the maximum data recorded at almost 30 pounds, followed by Brazil and Japan ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47567567568 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71074479185 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654054054054 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3281426811 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.625 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268219826558 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130105065839 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.178459167812 0.0843802449381 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222998497331 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206088684649 0.0819641961636 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.