Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefit the economies of developing countries. Other people take the oppisite view and feel that these large multinationals are generally harmful. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Large-scaled multinational companies are increasingly expanding their businesses into developing nations. While some people believe that a great number of benefits will be brought to the economies of those developing countries, others take the opposite view and suggest that more harm is likely to be inflicted. In this essay I will discuss both views and argue in favor of the first opinion.
A growing body of research suggest that multinationals have a generally positive effect on economies of developing countries. One key benefit is that international investment helps creates job opportunities for local people which can lead to a better living standard. Taking VietNam as an example, numernous Japanese and Korean manufacturers have launched in some parts of the country the last few years. Each of these factories offers thousands of jobs to locals both skilled and unskilled. It becomes obvious across vietnam that people living in provinces where international companies are located lead a wealthier life.
However, there are also negative impacts from international corporations which should be considered. One major issue is that the increasing of manufacturers results in pollution in areas they operate. Given the fact that garbage disposal system in these countries are not as advanced, it is difficult to get rid of all waste coming out from industrial production from these multinationals. For example, due to the lack of proper waste treatments, India is suffering from heavily polluted water and the main pollutants are proven to be rubbish and chemical substances from factories.
In conclustion, while international investments bring about more environmental challenges to emergent nations, they also help create more jobs for local resident, thus reduce unemployment rate and increase standard of living in the area. In my opinion, despite having some negative effects, I believe multinational corporations are viturally benefical to the economies of the host countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-12 | sunflower1190 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | areyoucrazy | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-21 | areyoucrazy | 67 | view |
- In the developed world the average life expectancy is increasing What problem will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of aging populations 89
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Some people believe that it is a good idea that older people continue to work if it is possible for them to do Do you agree or disagree 74
- Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefit the economies of developing countries Other people take the oppisite view and feel that these large multinationals are generally harmful Discuss both views and give 67
- Some people believe that the activities of large multinational corporations mostly benefit the economies of developing countries Other people take the oppisite view and feel that these large multinationals are generally harmful Discuss both views and give 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, thus, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58881578947 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12210911991 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4099413171 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269798637642 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815871506284 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710923953436 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157316997648 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117222424389 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.