International travel is extremely popular these days. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
Nowadays, international tourism has become more popular than it used to. Personally, I do think this trend offers pros and cons.
On the one hand, there are plenty of advantages for both tourist attractions and visitors. Firstly, travelling raises the employment rate by creating job opportunities for local residents. As many shops and restaurants are opened to serve tourists, indigenous people can make a living. For example, in some tourist destinations, the demand for entertainment of visitors is increasing, so this allows native people to create amusement parks to attract visitors. As a result, the local residents have an amount of money from serving tourists for living and the joblessness rate decreases. Secondly, not only the visited country but also visitors are offered to enhance mutual understanding. For instance, when people travel to a nation, they have a chance to learn more about the nation's culture, lifestyle, language or even its residents that facilitate integration.
On the other hand, tourism offers as many drawbacks as benefits. Firstly, for the nation visited, travelling does tremendous harm to the environment as the more people commute, the more trash is. A clear illustration for this is that lots of travellers who have bad behaviour often throw rubbish on the streets after buying food or drinks. This can cause air pollution, soil pollution, water pollution or even environmental deterioration. In addition, nowadays, when humans are suffering from Covid-19, international tourism can make this pandemic worse and worse. It is obvious that if people commute from this destination to another area, diseases can infect people easily. As a result, the pandemic will spread all over the world and become worse.
In summary, the popularity of international tourism has some advantages such as raising employment rate and promoting globalization. However, there are also several disadvantages in terms of environmental degradation and spreading infectious diseases recently.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | tata | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | dido272000 | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Lanlanlanlan | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54045307443 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06839126886 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605177993528 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3587403173 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1111111111 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164369116146 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491267358021 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437839491571 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119530869078 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459707916037 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.