33. Some people think environment problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others, however, think
that those problems cannot be solved unless individuals take some action. Discuss both these views and
give your own opinion.
Since environmental problems posed unforeseeable threads to human life, there have been raising concerns about this intractable issue. According to many professors in empirical environment domain, individuals should take some action to put an end to those problems. Nevertheless, there are a phenomenal upsurge of people holding a notion that individuals cannot do anything as environment problems are beyond one’s ability. This essay will discuss both views and ultimately give my own opinion.
On one side, many residents proclaim that environment issues are too big to be tackled by one person. First and foremost, human influences to worldwide problematic environmental issues are negligible, thus these problems need global venues to address thoroughly. To be more specific, environmental problems consist of variety of domains such as deforestation, water contaminant, air pollution, ect and one’s knowledge cannot comprehend all these thorny issues. In turn, environmental problems need groups of experts with superior skill focus on one domain to be resolved. In addition, geographic barrier can be the biggest constraints to one person to untangle natural problems. For example, one cautious resident can only propagate to local inhabitants and thus change their own neighborhood, not the whole world. The second worth-mentioning point is that one method to protect the environment can probably not be applied in some countries due to difference in culture and nature. For instance, some effective propaganda of environment protection may fall on deaf ears in some countries due to the remaining more serious social issues such as war or pandemic. Therefore, government should take these environmental issues into consideration to find out universal methods for every nation to manipulate in long term.
Besides, the idea that everyone should take some action to improve the reality is undeniable. To start with, residents’ awareness is considered as a prerequisite contributes to environment protection. Nonetheless, governments’ strict sanctions aimed at environment protection cannot render good results unless residents follow the regulation. Furthermore, raising public awareness can be apply in every parts of the world as it does not require giant budget or complex strategies to be manipulated. The second testament is that individuals should change habits to bring about expectative effects on environments. As claimed by environmentalists, they put the environmental disastrous consequences down to impact of human bad habits. For instance, one of the habits which affect the environment worst is massive dispose of wastes to environment, which devastate the features there.
To recapitulate, the cooperation of both politics and community is needed to put an end to this terrible reality. My view is that, each individual should take action to protect environment as the advantage of it is evidently numerous in the long macro perspective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-30 | Manhthuy | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | adamneyul | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-28 | letcallmemit | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-19 | munmun0905 | 61 | view |
| 2020-03-25 | Nguyễn Lê Anh Thư | 67 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'upsurges'?
Suggestion: upsurges
...s. Nevertheless, there are a phenomenal upsurge of people holding a notion that individ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2528.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 445.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6808988764 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27312454311 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579775280899 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 800.1 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0438041082 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279816924695 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075323008344 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504828085611 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172557790654 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697942535889 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'upsurges'?
Suggestion: upsurges
...s. Nevertheless, there are a phenomenal upsurge of people holding a notion that individ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 8.3376753507 288% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2528.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 445.0 315.596192385 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6808988764 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27312454311 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579775280899 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 800.1 506.74238477 158% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0438041082 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.909090909 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2272727273 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31818181818 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279816924695 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075323008344 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504828085611 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172557790654 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697942535889 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 78.4519038076 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.