Topic: Some people think that children should begin their foreign language study at a very early age. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend?
Learning a foreign language at an early age is a new trend followed nowadays. Even in schools’ curriculum, subjects with different languages might be a must. There are, certainly, some consequences of applying the education of new languages on young children, both positive and negative results.
On the one hand, youthful children are quick learners, as well as great adapters. Compared to older generations, they are capable of being flexible, creative, and inventive. The earlier children start training, the more opportunities they can have to approach the foreign language in an exploratory manner as they are being exposed to unpressed learning sessions and exercises. Last but not least, young kids are very curious, which really helps motivate studying. Besides, their curiosity can be a beneficial factor for them to expand their knowledge about cultures and society while being educated.
On the other hand, learning other languages while having not got the hang of the mother tongue yet can make the kids use their native language improperly or forget partly about it. Furthermore, despite spending a similar amount of time training, not every child can learn the same portion as the others at such a young age. If their ability varies greatly in one class, standardizing and teaching all of them fittingly could be challenging. Finally, it is undoubted that, learning a totally new language is tiring and requires a lot of time to master. It, indirectly, increases the burden of a pupil who is supposed to learn new things in a stress-free environment.
In conclusion, there are both benefits and drawbacks of children learning a new language at a very young age that needed to be considered seriously. This might work unsurprisingly well in terms of the flexibility, creativity, and curiosity that youthful kids possess, but it can also turn out to be a two-edged sword and bring about many disadvantages. The learners have to understand both the foreign languages and their mother tongue at the same time while carrying the burden of needing to study other necessary subjects as well. Additionally, the teachers can have a lot of difficulties educating unstreamed classes with various levels of mastery in the language.
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 89
- Task 1 Department Stores and Online Stores in Australia The table gives information about department and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Departme 65
- Film is a less important form of art than literature and painting To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The world should have one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Discuss the pros and cons for children of watching television 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an exploratory manner" with adverb for "exploratory"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n have to approach the foreign language in an exploratory manner as they are being exposed to unpressed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, furthermore, if, really, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23545706371 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92215014799 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554016620499 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6331379925 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.176470588 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197037264894 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656108443497 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065888055133 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134656452963 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535374600432 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an exploratory manner" with adverb for "exploratory"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n have to approach the foreign language in an exploratory manner as they are being exposed to unpressed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, furthermore, if, really, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23545706371 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92215014799 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554016620499 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6331379925 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.176470588 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2352941176 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197037264894 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656108443497 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065888055133 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134656452963 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535374600432 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.