Endothermic Dinosaurs
Both the reading article and lecture debates about the endothermic characteristics-- animals feature that keep the temperature of the body unchanged in any conditions--of dinosaurs. Whilst the reading passage claims that the dinosaurs are endotherms grounding on the three specific reasons, the lecturer challenges each of the propositions made by author for several reasons.
The author, in the reading article, begins by mentioning that the fossils of dinosaurs was discovered on the polar regions where they must have maintained the temperature as per the surrounding one; however, the speaker refutes the position of the author by stating that the polar regions during the warm conditions were warm enough to sustain the lives of animals like dinosaurs. Meanwhile, during the cold conditions, it is highly probable that the dinosaurs might have migrated to the other places or underwent hibernation as other reptiles often do during those conditions.
The writer further asserts that position of the legs in the endotherms allows various physical activity as running which tends to be underneath the body as of dinosaurs. The lecturer questions the writers argument by stating that not only dinosaurs were not the high energy animals to carry out the activities such as running, but also the legs underneath the body supports other things too. Continuing to it, she adds that the legs provided underneath the body helps the dinosaurs to supports its larger body weight.
Finally, the reading article posits that bones of the endotherms were highly enriched with the Haversian canals ( canals which support the rapid body growth) which was abundantly seen in the fossils of the dinosaurs too. As opposed to the articles opinion, the lecturer maintains that there was the presence of the growth rings in the bones of dinosaurs which implies the thickening of the bone ultimately signifying no rapid growth. On top of that, she further adds that there was inconsistency observed in the growth patterns of the dinosaurs which was not the common traits of the perfect endotherms.
To summarize, the writer and lecturer holds the opposite views on the endothermic characteristics of the dinosaurs which makes difficult for both of them in finding the common ground.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-12 | ManishAdh | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-01 | nicatkazimli | 80 | view |
| 2020-04-11 | Ammarak444 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | masoumsaie | 87 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | comando | 73 | view |
- Migration of Dinosaurs to South 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People today spend too much money on clothing to improve their appearance Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use memorized examples 90
- Chevalier s Memoir 80
- Possible Application of Airships 80
- Protection of Forest Through International Fund 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...f dinosaurs. The lecturer questions the writers argument by stating that not only dinos...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: canals
...were highly enriched with the Haversian canals canals which support the rapid body growth whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ighly enriched with the Haversian canals canals which support the rapid body grow...
^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'articles'' or 'article's'?
Suggestion: articles'; article's
...of the dinosaurs too. As opposed to the articles opinion, the lecturer maintains that th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, while, such as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 1373.03311258 139% => OK
No of words: 360.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31388888889 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80023009416 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494444444444 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 419.366225166 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 21.2450331126 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3263860001 49.2860985944 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.909090909 110.228320801 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7272727273 21.698381199 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306630334772 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124053770197 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606984115229 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184533746341 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054954330246 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.3589403974 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.11 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 63.6247240618 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.498013245 141% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.